[DFTB-Plus-User] Band Structure - carbon nanotube
paupitz at rc.unesp.br
paupitz at rc.unesp.br
Fri Dec 20 18:12:46 CET 2013
Ok,
thank you Dr. Aradi for your comments. Indeed, the
considered nanotubes are all aligned in z-axis direction.
Please, I would like to clarify another point regarding the paths
in klines:
would it be a good choice
to use a path similar to that used in the case of graphene
1 0.0 0.0 0.0
30 0.5 0.5 0.0
30 0.66667 0.33333 0.0
20 0.0 0.0 0.0
or not ? If not, what would be the recommended ?
Thank you.
>> For the ground-state density for the system, I used
>> SupercellFolding{
>> 4 0 0
>> 0 4 0
>> 0 0 4
>> 0.5 0.5 0.5
>> }
>> but don't know if this is correct.
>
> given that you are using a 1D systemt, why do you sample along every
> dimension 4 times? If your wire were aligned along the z-axis, you had
> typically
>
> 1 0 0
> 0 1 0
> 0 0 8
> 0.0 0.0 0.5
>
>
>> what would be a good path to choose for these
>> Klines ? Would it be the same for all set of (n,m) nanotube
>> chiral index ?
>
> If they are oriented along the same axis (e.g. z), then ye.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Bálint
>
> --
> Dr. Bálint Aradi
> Bremen Center for Computational Materials Science, University of Bremen
> http://www.bccms.uni-bremen.de/cms/people/b_aradi/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DFTB-Plus-User mailing list
> DFTB-Plus-User at dftb-plus.info
> http://www.dftb-plus.info/mailman/listinfo/dftb-plus-user
>
---------------------------------------------
Prof. Dr. Ricardo Paupitz B. dos Santos
IGCE - Unesp - Universidade Estadual Paulista
Departamento de Física
Av. 24-A n. 1515 Bela Vista
Rio Claro - SP
CEP 13506-900
Rio Claro (SP), Brasil
Phone: +55-19-3526 9156
---------------------------------------------
More information about the DFTB-Plus-User
mailing list