[DFTB-Plus-User] Problems with Ni-Ni parameter set
Ashwin Ramasubramaniam
ashwin.ramasubramaniam at gmail.com
Tue Dec 7 19:09:19 CET 2010
Hello,
I seem to be having trouble getting the Ni-Ni parameter set to
correctly reproduce the bulk Ni fcc structure with the trans3d
parameter set. I try to generate an energy vs. lattice parameter curve
using the script below:
=========
#! /bin/bash
for a in 3.49 3.50 3.51 3.52 3.53 3.54 3.55 3.56 3.57 3.58 3.59 3.60
do
b=$(echo "$a/2"|bc -l)
cat >dftb_in.hsd <<!
Geometry = {
Periodic = Yes
LatticeVectors [Angstrom] = {
$b $b 0.0
$b 0.0 $b
0.0 $b $b
}
TypeNames = { "Ni" }
TypesAndCoordinates [relative] = {
1 0.00 0.00 0.00
}
}
Hamiltonian = DFTB {
SCC = Yes
SCCTolerance = 1e-5
MaxAngularMomentum = {
Ni = "d"
}
SlaterKosterFiles = Type2FileNames {
Prefix = ""
Separator = "-"
Suffix = ".skf"
}
KPointsAndWeights = SupercellFolding {
21 0 0
0 21 0
0 0 21
0.0 0.0 0.0
}
SpinPolarisation = NonColinear {
InitialSpins = {
AtomSpin = {
Atoms = 1:-1
SpinPerAtom = 0.0 0.0 1.0
}
}
}
SpinConstants = {
Ni = {
# Wss Wsp Wsd Wps Wpp Wpd Wds Wdp Wdd
-0.016 -0.012 -0.003 -0.012 -0.022 -0.001 -0.003 -0.001 -0.018
}
}
Filling = MethfesselPaxton {
Temperature [K] = 0.0
Order = 2
}
}
!
dftb+
echo $a >> SUMMARY
grep Mermin detailed.out >> SUMMARY
done
============
The resulting output looks like this:
3.49
Total Mermin free energy: -1.9957949329 H -54.3083 eV
3.50
Total Mermin free energy: -1.9991749718 H -54.4003 eV
3.51
Total Mermin free energy: -2.0024539886 H -54.4895 eV
3.52
Total Mermin free energy: -2.0055871453 H -54.5748 eV
3.53
Total Mermin free energy: -2.0085331500 H -54.6550 eV
3.54
Total Mermin free energy: -2.0112561646 H -54.7291 eV
3.55
Total Mermin free energy: -2.0137270004 H -54.7963 eV
3.56
Total Mermin free energy: -2.0159245062 H -54.8561 eV
3.57
Total Mermin free energy: -2.0178337657 H -54.9081 eV
3.58
Total Mermin free energy: -2.0194447286 H -54.9519 eV
3.59
Total Mermin free energy: -2.0207743557 H -54.9881 eV
3.60
Total Mermin free energy: -2.0218200760 H -55.0165 eV
The bulk lattice parameter for fcc-Ni is about 3.52 A... clearly, the
energy is still decreasing monotonically at 3.60 A. Am I doing
something trivially wrong here or were the Slater-Koster parameters
not fit to the bulk fcc phase?
thanks,
-Ashwin.
More information about the DFTB-Plus-User
mailing list