[DFTB-Plus-User] .cube file
Reinaldo Pis Diez
reinaldo.pisdiez at gmail.com
Thu Nov 18 14:09:09 CET 2010
Dear Vladimir,
Although I never calculated EPs for slabs nor for solids, I should
say that EP's are mapped on electronic density surfaces. That is,
you need two cube files, one for the density and other for the EP.
I was checking some older links regarding visualization of outputs
from different programs, but unfortunately they all are broken :-(
Regards,
Reinaldo
On 11/18/2010 09:43 AM, Vladimir Yushkevich wrote:
>
> Dear Bálint Aradi,
>
> Thank you for the previous answer. How about electrostatic
> potential? I need to make additional transformations? If, yes, I
> need to use Ewald summation technique (my system is surface slab)?
> Or may be is possible to get potential directly from DFTB+ output?
>
> Best regards, Vladimir Yushkevich
>
>
>
> 2010/11/9 Bálint Aradi <balint.aradi at bccms.uni-bremen.de
> <mailto:balint.aradi at bccms.uni-bremen.de>>
>
> Dear Vladimir,
>
> > My question is concerning to the .cube (Gaussian Cube) file
> structure. This
> > file is generated by Waveplot. The number of grid points in
> each direction
> > which I use is 50. The all volume of supercell is divided by
> this number in
> > each direction. For this we can interpret obtaining charge
> density like each
> > value in .cube file (the block of data after header and
> coordinates)
> > correspond to density in quite small volume? I need some
> integrated density
> > (for example for different XY planes in my supercell). I
> guess that Waveplot
> > uses formatted output for charge density like:
> >
> > *for* (*int* ix = 0; ix<nX; ix++) {
> >
> > *for* (*int* iy = 0; iy<nY; iy++) {
> >
> > *for* (*int* iz = 0; iz<nZ; iz++) {
> >
> > System.*out*.print(" "+ density[ix][iy][iz]);
> >
> > *if* (iz % 4 == 3) System.*out*.print("\n");
> >
> > }
> >
> > System.*out*.print(" end y"+"\n");
> >
> > }
> >
> > }
> >
> > Is it true? I mean that the grid is arranged with the X axis
> as the outer
> > loop and the Z axis as the inner loop?
>
> That's true, we use the "traditional" Gaussian cube format. One
> description you find e.g. here
>
> http://local.wasp.uwa.edu.au/~pbourke/dataformats/cube/
> <http://local.wasp.uwa.edu.au/%7Epbourke/dataformats/cube/>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Bálint
>
> --
> Dr. Bálint Aradi
> Bremen Center for Computational Materials Science, University of
> Bremen
> http://www.bccms.uni-bremen.de/en/~b_aradi
> <http://www.bccms.uni-bremen.de/en/%7Eb_aradi>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DFTB-Plus-User mailing list
> DFTB-Plus-User at dftb-plus.info <mailto:DFTB-Plus-User at dftb-plus.info>
> http://www.dftb-plus.info/mailman/listinfo/dftb-plus-user
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DFTB-Plus-User mailing list
> DFTB-Plus-User at dftb-plus.info
> http://www.dftb-plus.info/mailman/listinfo/dftb-plus-user
More information about the DFTB-Plus-User
mailing list