[DFTB-Plus-User] DOS Fermi Energy problem
Ezgi Erdogan
ezgierdo at gmail.com
Thu Aug 20 15:07:47 CEST 2009
Sorry for band.dat miss typing but still my question is the same.. while
sending e-mail i wrote wrong.
2009/8/20 Ezgi Erdogan <ezgierdo at gmail.com>
> Dear users,
> I would like to ask you the density of states (DOS) graphics. I have
> trouble around fermi level.
>
> 1- Proper Density and Unitcell Geometry
> a) dftb_in_dos.hsd input file is:
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////
> Geometry = GenFormat {
> <<<"dftb_in.geometry.gen"
> }
>
> Hamiltonian = DFTB {
> SCC = No
> SCCTolerance = 1e-5
> MaxAngularMomentum = {
> C = "p"
> H = "s"
> }
> SlaterKosterFiles = {
> C-C = ""
> C-H = ""
> H-C = ""
> H-H = ""
>
> }
> PolynomialRepulsive = SetForAll{No}
>
> KPointsAndWeights = SupercellFolding {
> 8 0 0
> 0 1 0
> 0 0 1
> 0.5 0.0 0.0
> }
> }
>
>
> b) dftb_in_dos.geometry.gen
> ///////////////////////////////////////////
> For Density of State calculation we have to shift our geometry to Unitcell.
> 28 S
> C H
> 1 2 0.98140000 1.04655000 0.00000000
> 2 1 1.54350100 1.97980000 0.00000000
> 3 1 0.85434800 3.22200000 0.00000000
> 4 1 1.52784100 4.44910000 0.00000000
> 5 1 0.83841700 5.70995000 0.00000000
> 6 1 1.52558700 6.93745000 0.00000000
> 7 1 0.85861600 8.16790000 0.00000000
> 8 1 1.55011300 9.44240000 0.00000000
> 9 1 0.88311300 10.67285000 0.00000000
> 10 1 1.56219600 11.92150000 0.00000000
> 11 1 0.86961700 13.18065000 0.00000000
> 12 1 1.52639800 14.42235000 0.00000000
> 13 1 0.76925600 15.62445000 0.00000000
> 14 2 1.44626500 16.47830000 0.00000000
> 15 2 3.49406700 1.00195000 0.00000000
> 16 1 2.96557000 1.95460000 0.00000000
> 17 1 3.69848600 3.17155000 0.00000000
> 18 1 3.00933300 4.41370000 0.00000000
> 19 1 3.70284500 5.69035000 0.00000000
> 20 1 3.02619500 6.93325000 0.00000000
> 21 1 3.69503000 8.16930000 0.00000000
> 22 1 3.00756000 9.44100000 0.00000000
> 23 1 3.67642400 10.67705000 0.00000000
> 24 1 2.99974500 11.91995000 0.00000000
> 25 1 3.68177400 13.20275000 0.00000000
> 26 1 3.00338200 14.40000000 0.00000000
> 27 1 3.60368600 15.68735000 0.00000000
> 28 2 2.82484200 16.44975000 0.00000000
> 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000
> 5.009544167 0.00000000 0.00000000
> 0.00000000 50.00000000 0.00000000
> 0.00000000 0.00000000 50.00000000
>
>
> 2- Run this input and geometry.
>
> Look for Fermi Energy Level.
> Fermi energy: -0.1837716172 H -5.000680 eV
> Band energy: -43.6825057076 H -1188.661459 eV
> TS: 0.0000000000 H 0.000000 eV
> Band free energy (E-TS): -43.6825057076 H -1188.661459 eV
> Extrapolated E(0K): -43.6825057076 H -1188.661459 eV
>
>
> Energy H0: 0.0000000000 H 0.000000 eV
> Total Electronic energy: -43.6825057076 H -1188.661459 eV
> Repulsive energy: 1.4070475536 H 38.287712 eV
> Total energy: -42.2754581540 H -1150.373747 eV
> Total Mermin free energy: -42.2754581540 H -1150.373747 eV
>
> Calculation with static geometry
>
> Non-SCC calculation
>
>
> 2- For proper dos.dat plotting we have to use 2 scripts :
>
> band2dat and dosplot.in
>
>
> a) band2dat -N dftb_in_dos.band.out band.dat
> b) for dosplot in:
>
> [gauss]
> coefficient = 0.2
> exponent = 20.0
> [data]
> nr_kpoints = 50 #change this which k point you want to calculate
> kweights = 1.000000
>
> eigenvalues = << band.dat !!!! not dftb_in_dos.dat
> eigval_order = k_major
>
> dosplot dosplot.in > dos.dat if you run from your folder "bin"
>
> 3- and to plot:
> xmgrace dos.dat
>
> Now here is my question is coming. In this geometry there should be
> confused Fermi Energy Level or I am calculating in wrong way? So which Fermi
> Energy Level in this DOS graphics should be done. From detailed.out file we
> can say: Fermi energy: -0.1837716172 H -5.000680 eV. To shift +Efermi
> Level or -Efermi Level or just draw this plot between -4 to 4 or what could
> be other solution? For my further calculation I have to get proper Fermi
> Energy Level and DOS graphs.
>
> Thank you for support
>
> Ezgi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.zfn.uni-bremen.de/pipermail/dftb-plus-user/attachments/20090820/fb2ad263/attachment.htm>
More information about the DFTB-Plus-User
mailing list